
CDC Telework Ban: Union Alleges Civil Rights Violation
HHS ended CDC's union agreements, restricting telework for employees with disabilities. Unions claim civil rights violation, retaliatory discrimination and legal violations. Trump order cited.
HHS ended CDC's union agreements, restricting telework for employees with disabilities. Unions claim civil rights violation, retaliatory discrimination and legal violations. Trump order cited.
Trump's plan offers law enforcement a 3.8% pay boost while other federal employees get only 1%, sparking debate. Concerns raised about fairness, inflation, and workforce morale with potential consequences on border security.
GAO report reveals federal employees face hurdles changing names due to insufficient agency guidance, impacting job duties. Recommendations for improvement across agencies like IRS, VA, and SSA.
Trump administration fights court rulings on mass firings of federal probationary employees. The Supreme Court weighs in, focusing on labor relations and agency accountability.
A union, IFPTE, challenges Trump's executive order restricting federal employees' bargaining rights, citing national security concerns and First/Fifth Amendment violations. The lawsuit targets Defense Secretary Hegseth's implementation.
OPM urges federal agencies to generously consider telework and flexible arrangements for religious accommodations, following the Groff v. DeJoy ruling. Agencies must engage in good faith with employees.
With increased ICE enforcement, federal employees from various agencies are being reassigned to assist in apprehending and deporting undocumented immigrants. This shift has sparked controversy and internal strain.
HDHPs with HSAs offer federal employees savings through lower premiums and tax advantages. Understand deductibles, HSA contributions, investment risks, and eligibility to make informed choices about health plans.
A judge blocked Trump's order limiting collective bargaining rights for federal employees, siding with unions. The order, citing national security, faced legal challenges over its scope and impact on labor rights.
OPM proposes reviving Schedule F, potentially stripping civil service protections from thousands of federal workers in policy-related roles. Critics cite concerns about political influence and job security.
Interior Department CIOs fired after pushing back against DOGE demands for access to federal employee payroll system. Concerns raised over data privacy and security. Leadership exodus ensues.
The Trump administration appears to be preparing to comply with multiple court orders to quickly place tens of thousands of federal workers fired during their probationary periods, according to officials at three agencies briefed on the plans.
Education joins the Office of Personnel Management, General Services Administration and U.S. Agency for International Development in issuing widespread layoffs to date.
Staff in their probationary periodsâmostly recent hires, though in some cases longtime federal workersâreceived notice that they must report into the office Thursday and bring all of their government equipment, identification cards, parking permits and other documents.
The initial suit, filed in the Washington, D.C. District Court by two anonymous federal employees, claims OPM â working with Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency â violated the 2002 E-Government Act by bypassing a required privacy impact assessment, or PIA, before standing up the email platform.
Max Stier, president of the Partnership for Public Service, issued a statement Tuesday blasting the measure as one that, if successful, could create critical skills gaps at agencies and hurt mission delivery.
Former President Donald Trump has previously said he would âdismantle the deep stateâ and reinstitute his 2020 Schedule F policy to convert federal employees in policy-related positions to roles exempt from civil service protections, effectively making them easier to remove.